Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Properties and Clinical Flexibility Between Two Types of Nickel Titanium Endodontic Files

Authors

  • Masooma Zehre Alizai Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine
  • Shafaq Sarim Department of Operative Dentistry, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Abdur Rehman Department of Dental Materials, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan.

Keywords:

nickel titanium, comparative evaluation, rotatory endofiles

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Objective:
To analyse the flexibility of  two different generation of rotary endodontic file system by comparing second generation & fifth generation nickel-titanium rotary endodontic files at 5mm from the tip of the file in terms of mean (N/mm2).

Study design/ setting:

This research was performed in the department of Operative Dentistry, Hamdard University Dental Hospital, Karachi & at PCSIR Laboratory, Karachi.

Methodology:

This cross sectional study was performed in the department of Operative Dentistry HUDH & at PCSIR Laboratory, Karachi. First generation rotary endodontic file selected for this purpose was Protaper, Dentsply TM files while fifth generation rotary endodontic file selected for this purpose was KometSkyTM. Nickel Titanium rotary Endodontic files were loaded on a load testing cell & two-point bending test was performed. The files were measured at 5mm from the tip using a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Japan) and marked with a rubber stopper.   Each file was secured between two metal plates on a load-sensing cell. A universal testing machine (Instron, 5KN model 4301, Norwood, MA) was used to bend the files to a maximum deflection of 4.5mm at a rate of 2mm/minute at room temperature (22oC +/- 1oC).

Results:

 Fifth-generation file is more flexible (p=0.0001) compared to second generation file with test value 2.89 with 95 Confidence interval. Mean value of 3.7092 was recorded for Fifth generation rotary files & 2.846 for second generation rotary endodontic files.

Conclusion:

Mean value of the fifth generation endodontic files was highly significant i.e p=0.0001 compared to second generation endodontic files

Published

2025-05-07

How to Cite

Alizai, M. Z., Sarim, S. ., & Rehman, A. . (2025). Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Properties and Clinical Flexibility Between Two Types of Nickel Titanium Endodontic Files . ALTAMASH JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY AND MEDICINE, 3(2), 58–66. Retrieved from https://ajdm.altamash.edu.pk/index.php/ojs3/article/view/77